If your
restaurant hasn’t been on the receiving end of a legal shakedown from a patent
troll, your time may be running out.
Over the
past few years, patent
trolls—companies that purchase vague patents and threaten to sue
restaurants and other businesses that don’t pay licensing fees for their use of
common technologies—have cost the economy more than $20 billion a year. The
number of lawsuits is on the rise. Patent
Freedom, which collects data on patent troll activity, reports that 3,716
companies faced lawsuits from patent trolls in 2013, up from 3,352 the year
before.
And patent
trolls aren’t just going after big companies. A 2012 study
by Boston University researchers found that most defendants in suits
brought by patent trolls were small or medium-sized companies—those that can
least afford the often seven-figure costs of defending against patent
infringement lawsuits.
Patent
trolls have come after restaurants for common service-enhancing features like
online ordering, in-store WiFi, and digital menu boards.
Seeking
relief for restaurants
The National
Restaurant Association (NRA) recently joined United for Patent Reform, a
coalition of businesses and trade groups representing technology, retail,
communications, construction and other sectors, to ask Congress to make changes
to help end frivolous patent-infringement lawsuits.
Among other
reforms, the coalition is seeking an end to vague demand letters designed to
extract early settlements; clear, specific explanations from patent trolls
regarding their interest in the patent; protections for the end users of
products and technology; and requirements for patent trolls to pay plaintiffs’
legal costs when their infringement lawsuits are unsuccessful.
Help could
be on the way in the form of the Innovation
Act, recently introduced in the House by Rep. Bob Goodlatte (R-Va.). The
bill aims to curb frivolous infringement lawsuits by requiring plaintiffs to
disclose the owner of the patent and why they’re suing the defendant, as well
as allow some of the costs of defense to be shifted to the plaintiff if the
lawsuit is unsuccessful. The bill passed the House with bipartisan support in
2013 before stalling in the Senate.
No comments:
Post a Comment